For most of us democracy means nothing more than the franchise of voting. We forget that democracy is also participatory, which requires working together within our communities to make a difference to our own lives and the lives of those around us.
The irony is that we often require painful incidents, like the ones we are going through, to remind us about this and to shake us out of the quagmire of problems that we are left to deal with.
According to John Kotter, an authority on leadership from the Harvard Business School, “Without enough leadership from enough people in existing arenas, they become too sluggish and uncreative to flourish in a world of change and flux. Without enough leadership to create and nurture new initiatives, an economy like India can’t keep a democracy stable. Leadership is not the only necessity for stability and progress, but without enough, democratic institutions remain fragile - always vulnerable to internal tyranny and external threats.”
In fact, we all have been limiting our and our nation’s potential thinking that true leaders are different . We have been indifferent to nation building thinking that exemplary leaders are extraordinary. But it stands to reason that at some point of time all great leaders, whether Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela or George Washington, were all ordinary individuals .
They took a decision to wriggle out of their comfort zones. They took a decision to challenge themselves and the world around. They took a decision to look beyond themselves , to get involved, to make a difference to the lives of millions of people around. And that is exactly what is required from each one of us right now.
As we traverse through this twilight zone, we cannot afford to restrict leadership to a few individuals . It is time for us to come out of our cosy homes, cocoons and comfort zones to tackle and solve our nation’s problems. It is time for us to remind each other that it is not up to ‘them’ , but up to us. It is up to us to build India as a nation of leaders — where everyone is a leader, where every one is a hero.
Probably our real tryst with destiny is just round the corner. Let us embrace it boldly.
Sangeeth Varghese is a leadership thinker from the LSE and the author of the best seller Decide to Lead .
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Features/Corporate_Dossier/Building_a_nation_of_heroes/articleshow/3825979.cms
Monday, December 15, 2008
Don't be paralysed by fear
Last friday, Shivkumar got his transfer orders and he is upset. For years he has served the company loyally, not taken a single day’s leave, made it to office even when he had fever. He has worked diligently and never been late to office, doing all his work, even that of others, staying back in office and leaving only after his boss had left, making sure that everything is in order.
All his life he had stayed in Lucknow, in his family house. He walked to work and enjoyed the neighbourhood. Now this! How could they do this to him? How could they transfer him to Allahabad ? Yes, the new office needed to be set up, but why him?
Surely they could send someone junior, or someone more experienced in setting up new offices? He had not taken a promotion so that he could stay here. He was willing to take a pay cut to stay here. He just did not want to go to Allahabad. But the new boss, who has came from Delhi, is a scoundrel. He will just not listen. “You must go to Allahabad , Shivkumarji.
The company needs you to do this. And I need you to do this. And it is for your own good.” Your own good? How can it be for his good? Moving to a new place, a new neighbourhood, a new house, the headache of school admissions , the pain of shifting furniture. And who would look after his family house while he was away? And his parents ? Would they also have to move? His mother would never agree.
Shivkumar does not know this, but he has become what Kaliya had become to Yamuna — poisonous. There was a bend in the river Yamuna near Vrindavan that was shunned by all the cowherds and cows. The water there was lethal. Even a blade of grass that fell into these waters shrivelled in an instant . This was the result of the poison that a great serpent called Kaliya spat out each day.
When Krishna learnt of this, he decided to tackle the serpent. “Don’t !” shouted his friends, but Krishna would hear none of it. He jumped into the river and began splashing about in glee, laughing at his friends who stood on the river banks begging him to come back. The disturbance caused Kaliya to stir and rise up from the riverbed. He sprang up and grabbed Krishna in his coils. He spread his hood and prepared to strike the young lad, but to his astonishment, Krishna turned out to be a nimble fighter, slipping out of his coils with ease and striking him hard on his hood.
Before Kaliya could react, Krishna had leapt on his hood and was dancing on it. No, that was no dance; he was being kicked into submission. “Go, go, go,” Krishna said. Kaliya resisted. He thrashed about, swung his tail like the trunk of an elephant and shook his hood, he hissed and he bared his fangs, he twisted and turned, rose up and went down the water, determined to shake Krishna off. But Krishna stood firm on his hood and grabbed his tail. He kept kicking Kaliya’s head, shouting, “Go, go, go.” Kaliya refused. “Why?” asked Krishna in a voice that was kind but firm.
“Because,” said Kaliya, “I am afraid. Beyond this bend lurks the hawk, Garuda. I am terrified of him. If he sees me, he will swoop down from the
skies, grab me by his talons and make a meal out of me. Here, I am unseen. Here, I am safe.” Krishna smiled and said, “Life is about movement, not stagnation. You cannot let fear paralyse you. The more you stay here, the more you poison the waters. Go, don’t be afraid. Have faith. You will survive. Just move. You will find a way to outwit Garuda and overcome your fear of him. You will. Trust me.”
In images, Kaliya, the serpent, is shown with a hood. A cobra spreads its hood only when it is stationary. When it is mobile it does not have a hood. The hooded Kaliya thus represents stillness. When Kaliya refuses to move, the water around him becomes poisonous. This clearly is a metaphor for one’s refusal to change out of fear — the refusal to move out of the zone of comfort, because exploration of the unknown terrifies us. Kaliya is terrified of Garuda. Garuda is at once a real fear and an imagined fear. Garuda is the bottleneck to Kaliya’s movement, to Kaliya’s growth, to Kaliya’s conquest of his own insecurity. What seems like punishment to Kaliya, is actually a lesson in wisdom.
“Go,” says Krishna, “Move on, face life, don’t hide. Swim in the river as you are supposed to. The more you hide, the more you harm yourself and others around you.” Shivkumar believes his boss from Delhi is Kaliya who needs to be kicked back by Krishna. But in fact, he himself is the Kaliya. His boss has recognised his potential — his ability to contribute so much more, not just to the organisation but also to himself. Shivkumar short sells himself, even to himself.
He hides behind apparent contentment. Yet, he is envious of the young ones in the company who have been promoted and who have been given better bonuses and incentives . He resents other people’s success . He wants success to come to him, but he refuses to change anything in his life. He will not compromise on his routines , in his working style or in his dealings with people.
He likes things to stay the way they are. He gets upset when bosses accept transfers, when the houses in the neighbourhood are broken down to make way for new structures. He loves telling all those who are willing to hear, “Those were the days!” Things are changing every day around Shivkumar. But Shivkumar is refusing to adapt. Before him is an opportunity to experience something new. A transfer, a new city, a new job, new friends, new opportunities. But he is afraid. Garuda lurks beyond the bend of his river. He is angry with Krishna. He does not want to go. But Krishna’s dance will not stop. The transfer order will not be revoked, and he will be told, “Go, go, go.”
Points To Ponder
Yamuna is the world around us, full of possibility, moving without pause Kaliya is our refusal to move out of our comfort zone which pollutes the neighbourhood Krishna dancing on Kaliya’s head forces him to find the courage to move on
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Features/Corporate_Dossier/Dont_be_paralysed_by_fear/articleshow/3825937.cms
All his life he had stayed in Lucknow, in his family house. He walked to work and enjoyed the neighbourhood. Now this! How could they do this to him? How could they transfer him to Allahabad ? Yes, the new office needed to be set up, but why him?
Surely they could send someone junior, or someone more experienced in setting up new offices? He had not taken a promotion so that he could stay here. He was willing to take a pay cut to stay here. He just did not want to go to Allahabad. But the new boss, who has came from Delhi, is a scoundrel. He will just not listen. “You must go to Allahabad , Shivkumarji.
The company needs you to do this. And I need you to do this. And it is for your own good.” Your own good? How can it be for his good? Moving to a new place, a new neighbourhood, a new house, the headache of school admissions , the pain of shifting furniture. And who would look after his family house while he was away? And his parents ? Would they also have to move? His mother would never agree.
Shivkumar does not know this, but he has become what Kaliya had become to Yamuna — poisonous. There was a bend in the river Yamuna near Vrindavan that was shunned by all the cowherds and cows. The water there was lethal. Even a blade of grass that fell into these waters shrivelled in an instant . This was the result of the poison that a great serpent called Kaliya spat out each day.
When Krishna learnt of this, he decided to tackle the serpent. “Don’t !” shouted his friends, but Krishna would hear none of it. He jumped into the river and began splashing about in glee, laughing at his friends who stood on the river banks begging him to come back. The disturbance caused Kaliya to stir and rise up from the riverbed. He sprang up and grabbed Krishna in his coils. He spread his hood and prepared to strike the young lad, but to his astonishment, Krishna turned out to be a nimble fighter, slipping out of his coils with ease and striking him hard on his hood.
Before Kaliya could react, Krishna had leapt on his hood and was dancing on it. No, that was no dance; he was being kicked into submission. “Go, go, go,” Krishna said. Kaliya resisted. He thrashed about, swung his tail like the trunk of an elephant and shook his hood, he hissed and he bared his fangs, he twisted and turned, rose up and went down the water, determined to shake Krishna off. But Krishna stood firm on his hood and grabbed his tail. He kept kicking Kaliya’s head, shouting, “Go, go, go.” Kaliya refused. “Why?” asked Krishna in a voice that was kind but firm.
“Because,” said Kaliya, “I am afraid. Beyond this bend lurks the hawk, Garuda. I am terrified of him. If he sees me, he will swoop down from the
skies, grab me by his talons and make a meal out of me. Here, I am unseen. Here, I am safe.” Krishna smiled and said, “Life is about movement, not stagnation. You cannot let fear paralyse you. The more you stay here, the more you poison the waters. Go, don’t be afraid. Have faith. You will survive. Just move. You will find a way to outwit Garuda and overcome your fear of him. You will. Trust me.”
In images, Kaliya, the serpent, is shown with a hood. A cobra spreads its hood only when it is stationary. When it is mobile it does not have a hood. The hooded Kaliya thus represents stillness. When Kaliya refuses to move, the water around him becomes poisonous. This clearly is a metaphor for one’s refusal to change out of fear — the refusal to move out of the zone of comfort, because exploration of the unknown terrifies us. Kaliya is terrified of Garuda. Garuda is at once a real fear and an imagined fear. Garuda is the bottleneck to Kaliya’s movement, to Kaliya’s growth, to Kaliya’s conquest of his own insecurity. What seems like punishment to Kaliya, is actually a lesson in wisdom.
“Go,” says Krishna, “Move on, face life, don’t hide. Swim in the river as you are supposed to. The more you hide, the more you harm yourself and others around you.” Shivkumar believes his boss from Delhi is Kaliya who needs to be kicked back by Krishna. But in fact, he himself is the Kaliya. His boss has recognised his potential — his ability to contribute so much more, not just to the organisation but also to himself. Shivkumar short sells himself, even to himself.
He hides behind apparent contentment. Yet, he is envious of the young ones in the company who have been promoted and who have been given better bonuses and incentives . He resents other people’s success . He wants success to come to him, but he refuses to change anything in his life. He will not compromise on his routines , in his working style or in his dealings with people.
He likes things to stay the way they are. He gets upset when bosses accept transfers, when the houses in the neighbourhood are broken down to make way for new structures. He loves telling all those who are willing to hear, “Those were the days!” Things are changing every day around Shivkumar. But Shivkumar is refusing to adapt. Before him is an opportunity to experience something new. A transfer, a new city, a new job, new friends, new opportunities. But he is afraid. Garuda lurks beyond the bend of his river. He is angry with Krishna. He does not want to go. But Krishna’s dance will not stop. The transfer order will not be revoked, and he will be told, “Go, go, go.”
Points To Ponder
Yamuna is the world around us, full of possibility, moving without pause Kaliya is our refusal to move out of our comfort zone which pollutes the neighbourhood Krishna dancing on Kaliya’s head forces him to find the courage to move on
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Features/Corporate_Dossier/Dont_be_paralysed_by_fear/articleshow/3825937.cms
Leadership lessons from the Family
A few weeks back I was having a conversation with Dav Whatmore, the legendary coach credited with turning around the national cricket teams of Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Dav has had a multicultural experience; he played international cricket for Australia and he coached the subcontinent teams. So what are the differences that Dav has noticed, and what are the leadership lessons that he can offer us, especially during these times of turmoil?
According to Dav, the greatest difference is that while, leaders in the western world are allowed to maintain ruthless professionalism, in the subcontinent they are expected to embrace more of a caring, parent approach. In the West, people are more tolerant towards harsh business decisions like retrenchment or realignment , since they perceive professionalism to be a two way street – just as people can be hired and fired, employees also have the freedom to be opportunistic in their own ways.
But in the subcontinent, rules are more subtle, and more based on values like trust and goodwill – the same values that define our families . We are willing to go an extra mile for our bosses and our peers, even if that does not translate into extra payment. So it is natural for us to expect gentler treatment, compared to our western counter parts. Here are couple of quick rules, specifically helpful during tough times.
Behave like a family:
A family could go through tough times, but at the same time, rules are clear - you cannot fire your children , or their mother. The only options left with you are sitting down with them, making them understand, or even demanding that they pull up their socks or tighten their belts to help the family tide over the crisis. In the subcontinent, where most of us do not separate our personal and professional lives, we expect almost the same treatment from our bosses. We expect to be reassured, and expect to be asked for help, if neededeven if that means taking a pay cut. But we don’t expect to be dealt harshly with, say, retrenchment.
Be the First to Sacrifice:
In a family situation, parents just don’t sit there preaching about the need for tightened purse strings, but they go ahead and practice it first. They are always the first ones to make the sacrifice. When the going gets tough, we expect our leaders to lead the way— to be an example in cutting costs, to be the first one to take salary reductions. However, if the leader is all mouth and no trousers, we get upset. Rightly so.
Leadership Takeaway:
Rules of leadership in the subcontinent are very different from that of the western part of the world. So do not blindly copy those for our organisations and systems.
Courtesy- sangeethv@leadcap.org
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Features/Corporate_Dossier/Leadership_lessons_from_the_Family/articleshow/3767485.cms
According to Dav, the greatest difference is that while, leaders in the western world are allowed to maintain ruthless professionalism, in the subcontinent they are expected to embrace more of a caring, parent approach. In the West, people are more tolerant towards harsh business decisions like retrenchment or realignment , since they perceive professionalism to be a two way street – just as people can be hired and fired, employees also have the freedom to be opportunistic in their own ways.
But in the subcontinent, rules are more subtle, and more based on values like trust and goodwill – the same values that define our families . We are willing to go an extra mile for our bosses and our peers, even if that does not translate into extra payment. So it is natural for us to expect gentler treatment, compared to our western counter parts. Here are couple of quick rules, specifically helpful during tough times.
Behave like a family:
A family could go through tough times, but at the same time, rules are clear - you cannot fire your children , or their mother. The only options left with you are sitting down with them, making them understand, or even demanding that they pull up their socks or tighten their belts to help the family tide over the crisis. In the subcontinent, where most of us do not separate our personal and professional lives, we expect almost the same treatment from our bosses. We expect to be reassured, and expect to be asked for help, if neededeven if that means taking a pay cut. But we don’t expect to be dealt harshly with, say, retrenchment.
Be the First to Sacrifice:
In a family situation, parents just don’t sit there preaching about the need for tightened purse strings, but they go ahead and practice it first. They are always the first ones to make the sacrifice. When the going gets tough, we expect our leaders to lead the way— to be an example in cutting costs, to be the first one to take salary reductions. However, if the leader is all mouth and no trousers, we get upset. Rightly so.
Leadership Takeaway:
Rules of leadership in the subcontinent are very different from that of the western part of the world. So do not blindly copy those for our organisations and systems.
Courtesy- sangeethv@leadcap.org
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Features/Corporate_Dossier/Leadership_lessons_from_the_Family/articleshow/3767485.cms
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)